Antonio Caballero v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB Appeal from 14th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 6, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01054-CV ANTONIO CABALLERO, Appellant V. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-04357 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated October 8, 2019, we informed appellant that the Dallas County District Clerk notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to file written verification that he had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or that he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if he did not file the required documentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). /Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE 191054F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ANTONIO CABALLERO, Appellant No. 05-19-01054-CV On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-04357. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek. Justices Pedersen, III and Carlyle participating. V. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB recover its costs of this appeal from appellant ANTONIO CABALLERO. Judgment entered November 6, 2019 –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.