Dennis Huffmaster v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc. Appeal from 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 22, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00697-CV DENNIS HUFFMASTER, Appellant V. AUTOFLEX LEASING, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-03426 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Molberg Opinion by Chief Justice Burns The filing fee and docketing statement in this case are past due. By postcard dated June 14, 2019, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated June 14, 2019, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b)(c). /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE 190697F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT DENNIS HUFFMASTER, Appellant No. 05-19-00697-CV On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-03426. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating. V. AUTOFLEX LEASING, INC., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee AUTOFLEX LEASING, INC. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant DENNIS HUFFMASTER. Judgment entered August 22, 2019 –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.