Neal Richards Group Austin Development, LLC, Neal Richards Group, LLC and Neal Richards Group Forest Park Development LLC v. West Summit Investments, LP and glendonTodd Capital, LLC and Todd Furniss Appeal from 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed; Opinion Filed November 19, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00662-CV NEAL RICHARDS GROUP AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, NEAL RICHARDS GROUP, LLC, AND NEAL RICHARDS GROUP FOREST PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Appellants V. WEST SUMMIT INVESTMENTS, LP, GLENDONTODD CAPITAL, LLC, AND TODD FURNISS, Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-12500 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Molberg, and Partida-Kipness Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Before the Court is the joint motion of appellants, Neal Richards Group Austin Development, LLC, Neal Richards Group, LLC, and Neal Richards Group Forest Park Development, LLC, and cross-appellants, GlendonTodd Capital, LLC and Todd Furniss, to dismiss this appeal as they have settled their differences. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). /Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE 190662F.P05 Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT NEAL RICHARDS GROUP AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, NEAL RICHARDS GROUP, LLC, AND NEAL RICHARDS GROUP FOREST PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Appellants No. 05-19-00662-CV On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-12500. Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Bridges and Molberg participating. V. WEST SUMMIT INVESTMENTS, LP, GLENDONTODD CAPITAL, LLC, AND TODD FURNISS, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. Judgment entered this 19th day of November, 2019. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.