One Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars and Forty-One Cents (1,167.41), et al. v. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appeal from 162nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 22, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00370-CV ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND FORTY-ONE CENTS (1,167.41), ET AL., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05623 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Molberg Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated July 10, 2019, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief nor has she corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 190370F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND FORTYONE CENTS (1,167.41), ET AL., Appellant No. 05-19-00370-CV On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05623. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee the State of Texas recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Tabrina Manning. Judgment entered August 22, 2019 –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.