International Fidelity Ins. Co. v. The Dallas County Bail Bond Board, Accredited Casualty & Surety Company, Inc., Mark Toliver, II, Agent d/b/a David's Bail Bonds and Mark Toliver, II Appeal from 134th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed; Opinion Filed November 6, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01423-CV INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE CO., Appellant V. MARK TOLIVER, II, AGENT D/B/A THE ORIGINAL DAVID’S BAIL BONDS AND MARK TOLIVER, II, Appellees On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-16793 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Myers The parties in this case, International Fidelity Insurance Co., Mark Toliver, II, agent d/b/a The Original David’s Bail Bonds, and Mark Toliver, II, have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, the parties state they “have resolved all issues between them by settlement . . . and therefore, ask that this appeal be dismissed.” Furthermore, “The parties have agreed that any costs incurred by Toliver should be taxed against the [sic] Mark Toliver, II and Mark Toliver, II, agent d/b/a The Original David’s Bail Bonds.” In accordance with the parties’ motion, we dismiss this appeal and order that each party bear its own costs of this appeal /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE 181423F.P05 –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INS. CO., Appellant No. 05-18-01423-CV On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-16793. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Osborne and Nowell participating. V. MARK TOLIVER, II, AGENT D/B/A THE ORIGINAL DAVID’S BAIL BONDS AND MARK TOLIVER, II, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. Judgment entered this 6th day of November, 2019. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.