In The Interest OF U.A.H., A Child Appeal from 256th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 20, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01060-CV IN THE INTEREST OF U.A.H., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-10128 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated October 31, 2018, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days, cautioning that the failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. That notice was returned to the Court marked, “RETURN TO SENDER, NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED, UNABLE TO FORWARD.” We then attempted to contact appellant by phone but got a recording that the voice mail box was full. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b) requires an unrepresented party to keep the Court apprised of her current mailing address. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b). Appellant has failed to do so and has not communicated with the Court since September 25, 2018. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 181060F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT IN THE INTEREST OF U.A.H., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-10128. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. No. 05-18-01060-CV In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee Ryan Moore recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant LaTracy Hawkins. Judgment entered December 20, 2018 –2–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
