In Re: Dederian Demond Herron Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Denied and Opinion Filed July 16, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00780-CV IN RE DEDERIAN DEMOND HERRON, Relator Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-03311-E MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart Before the Court is relator’s July 9, 2018 “Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus.” To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). In his petition, relator does not complain of or seek relief from any trial court actions or inactions. Although titled “Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus,” relator’s petition in this original proceeding is, in substance, a trial court petition in which relator sets out his claims in the underlying trial court proceeding and requests that the defendant be cited to appear and answer, a trial held, and judgment rendered in relator’s favor. Relator presents nothing for this Court to review. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. /Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE 180780F.P05 –2–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
