In The Interest Of S.V., S.V., and S.V., Children Appeal from 469th Judicial District Court of Collin County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 11, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00738-CV IN THE INTEREST OF S.V., S.V., AND S.V., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469-56356-2016 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright By order dated August 10, 2018, the Court granted the parties’ motion to abate the appeal to allow the trial court to sign an amended decree of divorce pursuant to their agreement. On October 10, 2018, the Court received a supplemental clerk’s record containing the Amended Final Decree of Divorce. By order dated October 18, 2018 the Court reinstated the appeal and instructed appellant to file, by October 29, 2018, either a motion to dismiss the appeal or a letter explaining why we should not dismiss the appeal as moot. We cautioned appellant that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not responded. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999) (case becomes moot and court loses jurisdiction if controversy between parties ceases to exist); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 180738F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT IN THE INTEREST OF S.V., S.V., AND S.V., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469-56356-2016. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. No. 05-18-00738-CV In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal. Judgment entered December 11, 2018. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.