Charles A. Farris, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed November 30, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00508-CV CHARLES A. FARRIS, ET AL, Appellants V. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-00365-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Justice Evans The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated June 26, 2018, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed and appellant has not provided the required documentation regarding the clerk’s record nor otherwise corresponded with the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 180508F.P05 /David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT CHARLES A. FARRIS, ET AL, Appellants No. 05-18-00508-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-00365-D. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Brown participating. V. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON recover its costs of this appeal from appellants CHARLES A. FARRIS, ET AL. Judgment entered this 30th day of November, 2018. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.