Annette L. Mundine v. Richard D Mundine, Sr. Appeal from 303rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 19, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00450-CV ANNETTE L. MUNDINE, Appellant V. RICHARD D MUNDINE, SR., Appellee On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-04446 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to the Court’s inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief to be filed by September 27, 2018.1 By postcard dated October 1, 2018, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 1 Our records indicate the notice was returned as unable to deliver. The clerk’s office left a voice message for appellant to contact the Court and update her address. Appellant has not updated her address. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 180450F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ANNETTE L. MUNDINE, Appellant No. 05-18-00450-CV On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-04446. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. V. RICHARD D MUNDINE, SR., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered December 19, 2018 –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.