Rodolfo Chapa v. Dallas Independent School District School District Board of Trustees Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 30, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00405-CV RODOLFO CHAPA, Appellant V. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-04593-A MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Bridges The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated June 15, 2018, we directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days. We expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, we have received no communication from appellant responsive to the June 15 correspondence, and we have not received the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 180405F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT RODOLFO CHAPA, Appellant No. 05-18-00405-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-04593-A. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Brown and Whitehill participating. V. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES recover its costs of this appeal from appellant RODOLFO CHAPA. Judgment entered November 30, 2018. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.