John C. Ganter v. Independent Bank, f/k/a United Community Bank, N.A. Appeal from 298th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 14, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00403-CV JOHN C. GANTER, Appellant V. INDEPENDENT BANK, F/K/A UNITED COMMUNITY BANK, N.A., Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-13675 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Seeking to appeal two “conclusions of law” the trial court made in response to appellee’s “Rule 248 Motion to Determine Legal Issues,” appellant has filed a petition for permissive appeal. We deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2017); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3, 42.3(a). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 180403F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT JOHN C. GANTER, Appellant No. 05-18-00403-CV On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-13675. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. V. INDEPENDENT BANK, F/K/A UNITED COMMUNITY BANK, N.A., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. It is ORDERED that appellee INDEPENDENT BANK, F/K/A UNITED COMMUNITY BANK, N.A. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant JOHN C. GANTER. Judgment entered June 14, 2018. –2–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
