William Carr v. Atlas GC Worldwide, LLC Appeal from 298th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 25, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00182-CV WILLIAM CARR, Appellant V. ATLAS GC WORLDWIDE, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06357 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright This Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it appeared the notice of appeal was untimely. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the issue with an opportunity for appellee to respond. The parties complied. In his notice of appeal, appellant states he is appealing from the trial court’s September 29, 2017 judgment nunc pro tunc and the trial court’s January 5, 2018 order denying his motion for new trial. An order denying a motion for new trial is not an independently appealable order with a separate timetable for appeal. See State Office of Risk Mgmt. v. Berdan, 335 S.W.3d 421, 428 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2011, pet. denied); Denton County v. Huther, 43 S.W.3d 665, 667 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, no pet.). If a party files a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate timetable, the notice of appeal is due ninety days after the date the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Without a timely notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See id. 25.1(b). The appealed judgment was signed on September 27, 2017. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial on October 6, 2017. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due on December 26, 2017, ninety days after the date the judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Appellant filed a notice of appeal on February 7, 2018, forty-three days past the deadline. Appellant fails to address the timeliness of the notice of appeal in his letter brief. Rather, he asserts this Court has jurisdiction because the appealed order is void for various reasons. Appellant’s assertions that the appealed judgment is void do not alter the deadline for filing a notice of appeal. Because appellant failed to timely file a notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 180182F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT WILLIAM CARR, Appellant No. 05-18-00182-CV On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06357. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. V. ATLAS GC WORLDWIDE, LLC, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee ATLAS GC WORLDWIDE, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellant WILLIAM CARR. Judgment entered July 25, 2018. –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
