Tony R. Saad v. Friedman & Feiger L.L.P. Appeal from 254th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 23, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00034-CV TONY R. SAAD, Appellant V. FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, LLP, Appellee On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-14203 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart Appellant appeals from the trial court’s Order Appointing Receiver and to Compel Discovery. Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant explains the appeal is now moot as the trial court has signed an Order Winding Up Receivership, Discharging Receiver, Approving Payments, and Declaring Final Judgment Satisfied. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). /Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE 180034F.P05 Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT TONY R. SAAD, Appellant No. 05-18-00034-CV On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-14203. Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. Justices Lang and Myers participating. V. FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, LLP, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, LLP recover its costs of this appeal from appellant TONY R. SAAD. Judgment entered this 23rd day of May, 2018. –2–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
