Theodist R. Thomas v. C & C Residental Properties Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed; Opinion Filed March 27, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01450-CV THEODIST R. THOMAS, Appellant V. C & C RESIDENTAL PROPERTIES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06257-C MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated February 12, 2018, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so could result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed and appellant has not provided the required documentation regarding the clerk’s record nor otherwise corresponded with the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE 171450F.P05 –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT THEODIST R. THOMAS, Appellant No. 05-17-01450-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06257-C. Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. Justices Francis and Brown participating. V. C & C RESIDENTAL PROPERTIES, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee C & C RESIDENTAL PROPERTIES recover its costs of this appeal from appellant THEODIST R. THOMAS. Judgment entered this 27th day of March, 2018. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.