AT&T Inc. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Texas v. Andrea Christian and Amber Hicks Appeal from 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 9, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01395-CV AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS, Appellants V. ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS, Appellees On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Seeking to appeal the trial court’s denial of their rule 91a motion to dismiss a baseless claim, appellants have filed a petition for permissive interlocutory appeal. We deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2017); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3, 42.3(a). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 171395F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS, Appellants No. 05-17-01395-CV On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-08124. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. It is ORDERED that appellees ANDREA CHRISTIAN AND AMBER HICKS recover their costs of this appeal from appellants AT&T INC. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T TEXAS. Judgment entered February 9, 2018 –2–