Qariah Lebanese Restaurant and Lounge, LLC v. Dallas County Appeal from 162nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 27, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01307-CV QARIAH LEBANESE RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE, LLC, Appellant V. DALLAS COUNTY, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. TX-17-00293 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated January 24, 2018, we informed appellant the clerk's record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so could result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed and appellant has not provided the required documentation regarding the clerk’s record nor otherwise corresponded with the Court. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 171307F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT QARIAH LEBANESE RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE, LLC, Appellant No. 05-17-01307-CV On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. TX-17-00293. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. V. DALLAS COUNTY, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee DALLAS COUNTY recover its costs of this appeal from appellant QARIAH LEBANESE RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE, LLC. Judgment entered March 27, 2018. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.