Brigetta D'Olivio v. Greg Fox and Laura Fox Appeal from 191st Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed January 29, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01119-CV BRIGETTA D'OLIVIO, Appellant V. GREG FOX AND LAURA FOX, Appellees On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-05606 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated December 6, 2017, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed and appellant has not provided the required documentation regarding the clerk’s record nor otherwise corresponded with the Court. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE 171119F.P05 –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT BRIGETTA D'OLIVIO, Appellant No. 05-17-01119-CV On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-05606. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. Justices Myers and Boatright participating. V. GREG FOX AND LAURA FOX, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellees GREG FOX AND LAURA FOX recover their costs of this appeal from appellant BRIGETTA D'OLIVIO. Judgment entered this 29th day of January, 2018. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.