Quintrick Delanero Bickham v. The State of Texas Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Affirmed and Opinion Filed August 8, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00650-CR QUINTRICK DELANERO BICKHAM, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-76654-H MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Myers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant Quintrick Delanero Bickham was indicted for the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. A jury found appellant guilty of the lesser-included offense of robbery. During the punishment phase, the trial court found one enhancement paragraph true and sentenced appellant to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. After reviewing counsel’s brief, appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 170650F.U05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT QUINTRICK DELANERO BICKHAM, Appellant No. 05-17-00650-CR On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-76654-H. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Myers and Stoddart participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered August 8, 2018. –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
