Baylor University Medical Center and Mary Susan Barnhill, as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Sarah P. Asche v. Fritz Asche, Vale Asche Elkins, Craig Asche, Lisa Mittnacht, and Rick Asche Appeal from Probate Court No. 2 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed; Opinion Filed January 4, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00233-CV BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AND MARY SUSAN BARNHILL, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SARAH P. ASCHE, Appellants V. FRITZ ASCHE, VALE ASCHE ELKINS, CRAIG ASCHE, LISA MITTNACHT, AND RICK ASCHE, Appellees On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-15-00010-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Lang We reinstate this appeal. Before the Court is the parties’ January 2, 2018 “Joint Motion to Lift Abatement and Dismiss Appeal Pursuant to Settlement.” The parties state they have settled all of their disputes arising from this litigation and request that we dismiss this appeal with each party to bear their own costs. We grant the parties’ joint motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE 160233F.P05 Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AND MARY SUSAN BARNHILL, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SARAH P. ASCHE, Appellants No. 05-16-00233-CV On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-15-00010-2. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices Fillmore and Schenck participating. V. FRITZ ASCHE, VALE ASCHE ELKINS, CRAIG ASCHE, LISA MITTNACHT, AND RICK ASCHE, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal pursuant to the parties’ agreement. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, we ORDER that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. Judgment entered this 4th day of January, 2018. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.