In Re: Peter Beasley Appeal from 162nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DENY; and Opinion Filed December 11, 2017. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01365-CV IN RE PETER BEASLEY, Relator Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-03141 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which he complains of a November 3, 2017 sanctions order and a November 22, 2017 order denying his motion to disqualify and recuse the trial judge. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought). /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE 171365F.P05

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.