In Re: Venky Venkatraman Appeal from 255th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DENY; and Opinion Filed November 29, 2017. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01349-CV IN RE VENKY VENKATRAMAN, Relator Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF04-11968 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court’s denial of relator’s emergency motion for enforcement of final orders. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought). 171349F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.