Mitko R. Mitev v. The Housing Authority of the City of Dallas Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 31, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00309-CV MITKO R. MITEV, Appellant V. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00360-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Francis, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to our notice regarding the reporter’s record, by order dated June 21, 2017, we ordered the appeal to be submitted without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief to be filed by July 21, 2017. By postcard dated July 24, 2017, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file his brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b),(c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 170309F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MITKO R. MITEV, Appellant No. 05-17-00309-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00360-B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Francis and Stoddart participating. V. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered August 31, 2017. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.