Daniel Hadera v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Super Shuttle International, Inc., Super Shuttle DFW, Inc., and Super Shuttle Franchise Corporation Appeal from 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 17, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01242-CV DANIEL HADERA, Appellant V. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SUPER SHUTTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC., SUPER SHUTTLE DFW, INC., AND SUPER SHUTTLE FRANCHISE CORPORATION, Appellees On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-15009 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Before the Court is appellant’s January 12, 2017 motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, appellant states the parties have settled this matter and no longer wish to pursue the appeal. We GRANT appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 161242F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT DANIEL HADERA, Appellant No. 05-16-01242-CV On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-15009. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SUPER SHUTTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC., SUPER SHUTTLE DFW, INC., AND SUPER SHUTTLE FRANCHISE CORPORATION, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellees OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SUPER SHUTTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC., SUPER SHUTTLE DFW, INC., and SUPER SHUTTLE FRANCHISE CORPORATION recover their costs of this appeal, if any, from appellant DANIEL HADERA. Judgment entered this 17th day of January, 2017. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.