Armando Miranda v. Wells Fargo, N.A. Appeal from 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed March 3, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00959-CV ARMANDO MIRANDA, Appellant V. WELLS FARGO, N.A., Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-12267 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Brown Opinion by Justice Bridges Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated January 3, 2017, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not filed his brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of his brief. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c). /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE 160959F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ARMANDO MIRANDA, Appellant No. 05-16-00959-CV On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-12267. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Myers and Brown participating. V. WELLS FARGO, N.A., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee Wells Fargo, N.A. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant Armando Miranda. Judgment entered March 3, 2017. –2–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
