In Re: Ace Parking Management, Inc. Appeal from 14th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DENY; and Opinion Filed December 29, 2016. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01478-CV IN RE ACE PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., Relator Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-05179 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Evans Before the Court is relator’s December 21, 2016 amended petition for writ of mandamus. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator’s amended petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny as moot relator’s December 27, 2016 motion to stay trial setting. /David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE 161478F.P05
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
