In the Interest of A.C.M., a child Appeal from 330th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed November 16, 2016. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01080-CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.C.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-19611 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Stoddart, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By letter dated October 13, 2016, we notified appellant that the Dallas County District Clerk informed the Court that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if the Court did not receive the required documentation within ten days, the Court might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, we have not received the requested verification or documentation, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 161080F.P05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT IN THE INTEREST OF A.C.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-19611. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Francis and Stoddart participating. No. 05-16-01080-CV In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee Sharron Meachem recover her costs of this appeal, if any, from appellant. Judgment entered this 16th day of November, 2016. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.