Sherry Xiaohua Xing v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services Appeal from 304th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed October 26, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00937-CV SHERRY XIAOHUA XING, Appellant V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Appellee On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 05-1296-W-304 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Lang This appeal concerns a parental termination. The notice of appeal was due within twenty days of the April 21, 2016 order of dismissal or, with a timely extension motion, no later than May 26, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 28.4(a)(1). The clerk’s record does not contain a copy of the notice of appeal, but our records reflect the notice of appeal was filed August 8, 2016. By letter filed September 20, 2016, we directed appellant to provide the Court, no later than September 30, 2016, a letter brief explaining how the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. See Garza v. Hibernia Nat. Bank, 227 S.W.3d 233, 233 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional). We cautioned appellant that failure to do so could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed the letter brief, and nothing before us demonstrates our jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE 160937F.P05 –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT SHERRY XIAOHUA XING, Appellant No. 05-16-00937-CV On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 05-1296-W-304. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices Myers and Evans participating. V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered this 26th day of October, 2016. –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
