Marvin Brock v. R.J.T. Property Management Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 3, 2016 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00751-CV MARVIN BROCK, Appellant V. R.J.T. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-01265-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated September 13, 2016, we notified appellant that we received notice from the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if the Court did not receive the required documentation within ten days, the Court might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed, we have not received the requested verification or documentation, nor has appellant corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 160751F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MARVIN BROCK, Appellant No. 05-16-00751-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-01265-B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. R.J.T. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee R.J.T. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT recover its costs of this appeal from appellant MARVIN BROCK. Judgment entered October 3, 2016. –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
