Marvin Brock v. R.J.T. Property and Management LLC Appeal from 116th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 4, 2016 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00722-CV MARVIN BROCK, Appellant V. R.J.T. PROPERTY AND MANAGEMENT LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-06888 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Fillmore, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated August 19, 2016, we notified appellant that we received notice from the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if the Court did not receive the required documentation within ten days, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, we have not received the requested verification or documentation, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 160722F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MARVIN BROCK, Appellant No. 05-16-00722-CV On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-06888. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Fillmore and Brown participating. V. R.J.T. PROPERTY AND MANAGEMENT LLC, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee R.J.T. Property and Management LLC recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Marvin Brock. Judgment entered October 4, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.