Ex Parte: Senrick Wilkerson v. The State of Texas Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 28, 2016. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00717-CR No. 05-16-00718-CR EX PARTE SENRICK WILKERSON Original Proceedings Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-01183 & F10-1184 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown The Court has before it Senrick Wilkerson’s June 20, 2016 petition for out of time appeals. The appropriate vehicle for seeking an out-of-time appeal is by writ of habeas corpus from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals filed under article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015); see also Portley v. State, 89 S.W.3d 188, 189 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, no pet); Ashorn v. State, 77 S.W.3d 405, 409 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. ref’d). This Court has no jurisdiction to grant out-oftime appeals. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss these appeals. Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 160717F.U05 /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT EX PARTE SENRICK WILKERSON On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-01183. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Lang-Miers and Evans participating. No. 05-16-00717-CR Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Judgment entered this 28th day of June, 2016. –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT EX PARTE SENRICK WILKERSON On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-01184. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Lang-Miers and Evans participating. No. 05-16-00718-CR Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Judgment entered this 28th day of June, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.