Helen Franks v. Stone Ranch Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 15, 2016 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00483-CV HELEN FRANKS, Appellant V. STONE RANCH, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-01682-E MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated June 22, 2016, we informed appellant that the Dallas County Clerk notified the Court the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation that she had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if she did not file the required documentation we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). To date, appellant has not filed the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 160483F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT HELEN FRANKS, Appellant No. 05-16-00483-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-01682-E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. STONE RANCH, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee STONE RANCH recover its costs of this appeal from appellant HELEN FRANKS. Judgment entered August 15, 2016_. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.