Mary Sanchez v. Spanish Brook Apts. Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 14, 2016 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00353-CV MARY SANCHEZ, Appellant V. SPANISH BROOK APTS., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-01033-A MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated March 29, 2016, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated March 29, 2016, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 160353F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MARY SANCHEZ, Appellant No. 05-16-00353-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-01033-A. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. SPANISH BROOK APTS., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee SPANISH BROOK APTS. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant MARY SANCHEZ. Judgment entered July 14, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.