Viewpoint, Inc. d/b/a Viewpoint Construction Software v. R&B Roofing, L.L.C. Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Vacated and Remanded; Opinion Filed October 20, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00280-CV VIEWPOINT, INC. D/B/A VIEWPOINT CONSTRUCTION SOFTWARE, Appellant V. R&B ROOFING, L.L.C., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-03209-E MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Myers Opinion by Justice Myers In appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss the Restrict Appeal, appellant informs the Court that the parties have “agreed to compromise and settle all outstanding matters” and have “executed a Confidential Compromise, Settlement, and Release Agreement.” Appellant “respectfully requests that the Court dismiss the restricted appeal without regard to the merits and allow the trial court to release the Default Judgment.” Appellant also “asks that the Court enter an Order dismissing the restricted appeal without regard to the merits and instruct the Trial Court to release the Default Judgment.” Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion to the extent that we vacate the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and we remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE 160280F.P05 –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT VIEWPOINT, INC. D/B/A VIEWPOINT CONSTRUCTION SOFTWARE, Appellant No. 05-16-00280-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-03209-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Lang-Miers participating. V. R&B ROOFING, L.L.C., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. Judgment entered this 20th day of October, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.