Rickey E. Williams v. US Bank National Association Appeal from 134th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 14, 2016 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00191-CV RICKEY E. WILLIAMS, Appellant V. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-07543 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated May 20, 2016, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation showing appellant has been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 160191F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT RICKEY E. WILLIAMS, Appellant No. 05-16-00191-CV On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-07543. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION recover its costs of this appeal from appellant RICKEY E. WILLIAMS. Judgment entered July 14, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.