George Jones Residential, LLC v. Antonio L. Adams Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 28, 2016 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01389-CV GEORGE JONES RESIDENTIAL, LLC, Appellant V. ANTONIO L. ADAMS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-03973-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Our records in this case indicate appellant is not currently represented by counsel. By order dated April 22, 2016, we informed appellant that, in Texas, a corporation may appear and be represented in court only by a licensed attorney and directed appellant to provide the Court with the name and address of counsel within thirty days. See Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., U.S.A., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996). We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the appeal being dismissed without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the Court with the name and address of counsel, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 151389F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT GEORGE JONES RESIDENTIAL, LLC, Appellant No. 05-15-01389-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-03973-D. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. ANTONIO L. ADAMS, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee ANTONIO L. ADAMS recover his costs of this appeal from appellant GEORGE JONES RESIDENTIAL, LLC. Judgment entered June 28, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.