Jess Ledbetter v. Gurley Place Apartments Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed May 17, 2016. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01245-CV JESS LEDBETTER, Appellant V. GURLEY PLACE APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04676-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to our letter regarding the reporter’s record in this case, the Court ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief to be filed by February 26, 2016. By postcard dated February 29, 2016, we notified appellant the time for filing appellant’s brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both appellant’s brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c). /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE 151245F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT JESS LEDBETTER, Appellant No. 05-15-01245-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04676-B. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justices Francis and Fillmore participating. V. GURLEY PLACE APARTMENTS, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee GURLEY PLACE APARTMENTS recover its costs of this appeal from appellant JESS LEDBETTER. Judgment entered this 17th day of May, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.