Patrish Ervin v. Villa Jolla d/b/a/ The Estara Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed May 26, 2016 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01102-CV PATRISH ERVIN, Appellant V. VILLA JOLLA D/B/A/ THE ESTARA, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04308-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges, and Justice Lang Opinion by Justice Bridges Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to our letter regarding the reporter’s record in this case, the Court ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief to be filed by March 6, 2016. By postcard dated March 9, 2016, we notified appellant the time for filing appellant’s brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both appellant’s brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c). /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE 151102F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT PATRISH ERVIN, Appellant No. 05-15-01102-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04308-D. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Lang participating. V. VILLA JOLLA D/B/A/ THE ESTARA, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee VILLA JOLLA D/B/A/ THE ESTARA recover its costs of this appeal from appellant PATRISH ERVIN. Judgment entered May 26, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.