Cordero Martez Brown v. The State of Texas Appeal from 363rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed July 14, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01007-CR CORDERO MARTEZ BROWN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13-60171-W MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges, and Justice Lang Opinion by Justice Lang Cordero Martez Brown waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §22.02(a) (West 2011). After finding appellant guilty, the trial court sentenced appellant to twenty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 151007F.U05 –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT CORDERO MARTEZ BROWN, Appellant No. 05-15-01007-CR On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13-60171-W. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Bridges participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered this 14th day of July, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.