Adam G. Arredondo, M.D. v. Texas Health Venture Ennis, LLC Appeal from 134th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 15, 2016 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00970-CV ADAM G. ARREDONDO, M.D., Appellant V. TEXAS HEALTH VENTURE ENNIS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-03652 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By order dated January 13, 2016 granting appellant’s unopposed third motion for an extension of time to file a brief, we directed appellant to file his brief by January 25, 2016. After appellant did not file his brief by that date, we notified appellant by postcard that the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed his brief or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of his brief. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 150970F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ADAM G. ARREDONDO, M.D., Appellant No. 05-15-00970-CV On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-03652. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. TEXAS HEALTH VENTURE ENNIS, LLC, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee TEXAS HEALTH VENTURE ENNIS, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellant ADAM G. ARREDONDO, M.D.. Judgment entered August 15, 2016. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.