Ann Stokley v. The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee for CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2003-1 Appeal from 44th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 10, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00921-CV ANN STOKLEY, Appellant V. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR CWABS, INC. ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2003-1, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-03285 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright In a letter dated August 11, 2015, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal. Specifically, there does not appear to be an appealable order. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our concern. Appellant filed a jurisdictional brief, pro se. Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and those interlocutory orders specifically authorized by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 30 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). A final judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and claims. See Lehmann, 30 S.W.3d at 195. In her notice of appeal, appellant states she is appealing the denial of her special appearance. A person may appeal from an interlocutory order that grants or denies a special appearance under rule 120a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(7) (West 2015). The record before this Court, however, does not contain an order on the appellant’s special appearance. In her jurisdictional brief, appellant acknowledges that there is no signed order denying her special appearance. Appellant relies on the trial court’s oral ruling on the record at the hearing on her motion. An oral rendition is not sufficient. The appellate timetable runs from the date the judgment or order is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co., 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam). The record before this Court does not contain an appealable order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 150921F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/____________________ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ANN STOKLEY, Appellant No. 05-15-00921-CV On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-03285. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR CWABS, INC. ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 20031, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2003-1 recover its costs of this appeal from appellant ANN STOKLEY. Judgment entered September 10, 2015. –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
