Richardson Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram v. James Rhodes Appeal from 298th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SET ASIDE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed September 25, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00814-CV RICHARDSON CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE RAM, Appellant V. JAMES RHODES, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-05795 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Brown, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Before the Court is appellant’s September 15, 2015 motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has informed the Court that the parties have settled their differences and asks us to set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. We grant appellant’s motion, set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 150814F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT RICHARDSON CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE RAM, Appellant No. 05-15-00814-CV On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-05795. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. Justices Brown and Schenck participating. V. JAMES RHODES, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we SET ASIDE the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and REMAND this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Subject to any agreement between the parties, we ORDER that appellee JAMES RHODES recover his costs of this appeal from appellant RICHARDSON CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE RAM. Judgment entered this 25th day of September, 2015. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.