Morris Coe v. Federal National Mortgage Association Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismiss; Opinion Filed June 10, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01489-CV MORRIS COE, Appellant V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-03634-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Lang The filing fee in this case is past due. By postcard dated November 21, 2014, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Thereafter, the clerk’s record in this case was filed but the reporter’s record was not filed. Our notifications to appellant regarding the overdue reporter’s record have been returned and were sent to a second address without response from appellant. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, responded to notifications regarding the reporter’s record, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(b), (c). /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE 141489F.P05 –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MORRIS COE, Appellant No. 05-14-01489-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-03634-B. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices Bridges and Schenck participating. V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION recover its costs of this appeal from appellant MORRIS COE. Judgment entered this 10th day of June, 2015. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.