In Re: C.T. and T.T. Appeal from 302nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DENY; and Opinion Filed September 16, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01157-CV No. 05-14-01158-CV No. 05-14-01159-CV No. 05-14-01160-CV No. 05-14-01161-CV IN RE C.T. AND T.T., Relator Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-21229-U Trial Court Cause No. 10-12513-2 Trial Court Cause No. 13-21227-2 Trial Court Cause No. 01-11212-U Trial Court Cause No. 12-275-U MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice O'Neill Relators filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining of numerous actions of the trial court. The facts and issues are well-known to the parties so we do not recount them here. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators petition for writ of mandamus. /Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE 141157F.P05 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
