Debra Emuedue v. Christopher Emuedue Appeal from 301st Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 19, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00865-CV DEBRA EMUEDUE, Appellant V. CHRISTOPHER EMUEDUE, Appellee On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-01570 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated August 13, 2014, we informed appellant that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to file written verification that she had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or that she had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if she did not file the required documentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed, appellant has not provided the required documentation, nor has she otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s record or this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 140865F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT DEBRA EMUEDUE, Appellant No. 05-14-00865-CV On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-01570. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. CHRISTOPHER EMUEDUE, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee CHRISTOPHER EMUEDUE recover his costs of this appeal from appellant DEBRA EMUEDUE. Judgment entered this 19th day of December, 2014. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.