James Michael Stuart and or all occupants v. U.S. Bank National Association Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; Opinion Filed October 20, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00652-CV JAMES MICHAEL STUART AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellant V. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-00955-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Francis, and Justice Myers Opinion by Justice Myers Appellant s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated August 8, 2014, we informed appellant that the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed him to file both his brief as well as a motion to extend time to file the brief within ten days of the date of the postcard. We cautioned appellant that the failure to file a brief and extension motion within the time stated would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or an extension motion, nor has he otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of his appeal. Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 140652F.P05 /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT JAMES MICHAEL STUART AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellant No. 05-14-00652-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-00955-B. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Chief Justice Wright and Justice Francis participating. V. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant JAMES MICHAEL STUART AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS. Judgment entered this 20th day of October, 2014. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.