Mallory York v. MaKeatha CooperAppeal from 330th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 14, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00621-CV MALLORY YORK, Appellant V. MAKEATHA COOPER, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF13-01004 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Brown Opinion by Justice Lang The clerk s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated June 23, 2014, we informed appellant that the District Clerk had notified the Court that the clerk s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk s record. We directed appellant to file written verification that appellant had paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk s record or that appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned that if appellant did not filed the required documentation within ten days of the date of the letter, we might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk s record or this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE 140621F.P05 2 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MALLORY YORK, Appellant No. 05-14-00621-CV On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF13-01004. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices Myers and Brown participating. V. MAKEATHA COOPER, Appellee In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee MAKEATHA COOPER recover her costs of this appeal, if any, from appellant MALLORY YORK. Judgment entered this 14th day of July, 2014. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
