Rachael Stokes v. Clark W. Steffens, D.D.S.Appeal from 192nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 27, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01542-CV RACHAEL STOKES, Appellant V. CLARK W. STEFFENS, D.D.S., Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-04728 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown The clerk s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated December 4, 2013, we informed appellant that the District Clerk had notified the Court that the clerk s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk s record. We directed appellant to file written verification that she had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk s record or that she had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if she did not file the required documentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk s record. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE 131542F.P05 2 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT RACHAEL STOKES, Appellant No. 05-13-01542-CV On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-04728. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Lang-Miers participating. V. CLARK W. STEFFENS, D.D.S., Appellee In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee CLARK W. STEFFENS, D.D.S. recover his costs of this appeal from appellant RACHAEL STOKES. Judgment entered this 27th day of February, 2014. /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
