Daniel Lee Knod v. The State of TexasAppeal from 265th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed September 15, 2013. In The nf Appiati 3FftI! Jntrirt øf t! xiui at Jattaii Qøurt No 05-13-00699-CR DANIEL LEE KNOD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-35548-R MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis Daniel Lee Knod pleaded guilty to theft of property having a value of $1,500 or more but less than $20,000. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court assessed punishment at confinement in a state jail for 365 days. Appellant waived his right to appeal in conjunction with the plea agreement. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified both that appellant waived his right to appeal and that the case involves a plea bargain and appellant has no right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim, App. 2005). Appellant informed the trial court at a hearing on September 10, 201 3 that he filed a pro se notice of appeal despite the waiver of his right to appeal; however, he no longer desires to appeal his conviction. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. /David Lewisl DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE Do Not Publish Thx. R. An. P.47 130699P.U05 -2- 0 (niirt nf ppia1a 3Fifti itrirt nf axis at Ja1ta JUDGMENT DANIEL LEE KNOD, Appellant No. O513OO699CR On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. Fl235548R, Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis, Justices Bridges and Fillmore participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Judgment entered this th 18 day of September, 2013. /David Lewis! DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.