Rosalinda Tovar and all occupants v. Couch Enterprises LPAppeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 26, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00418-CV ROSALINDA TOVAR, Appellant V. COUCH ENTERPRISES LP, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-00873-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O Neill, Francis, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Fillmore Since the filing of her notice of appeal on March 26, 2013, Rosalinda Tovar has taken no action in this case. She has failed to pay the required fees and failed to show she is entitled to proceed in the appeal without advance payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (filing fee), 20.1 (indigency), 35.3 (clerk s record fee). She has also failed to file the docketing statement as required by the rules of appellate procedure. See id. 32.1. By both postcard and letter, we cautioned Tovar that her appeal would be dismissed unless she filed the docketing statement and paid the necessary fees or showed she is indigent. More than a month has elapsed and she has taken no action or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 42.3(b), (c). /Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 130418F.P05 2 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ROSALINDA TOVAR, Appellant No. 05-13-00418-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-00873-D. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore. Justices O Neill and Francis participating. V. COUCH ENTERPRISES LP, Appellee In accordance with this Court s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that appellee Couch Enterprises LP recover its costs of this appeal from appellant Rosalinda Tovar. Judgment entered this 26th day of August, 2013. /Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.